The Periodic Table and The Learning of Chemistry: Possibilities of Integrating Robotics and Concept-Based Approaches in Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28301/ijsetm.v3i2.23Abstract
In this study, the authors investigate the potential of integrating robotics technology and concept-based teaching approaches to enhance the learning of abstract Chemistry concepts, focusing on the periodic table as both subject matter and tool. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the research employs descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection, including pre- and post-test experimental designs. Results suggest that combining robotics with concept-based teaching improves learners' deep understanding of chemistry concepts. The study highlights the promising benefits of integrating robotics technology and a concept-based approach for teaching chemistry, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.
References
Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330-333.
Alimisis, D. (2012, September). Robotics in education & education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics in Education (Vol. 9).
Ausbel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Cao, C., Vernon, R. E., Schwarz, W. H., & Li, J. (2021). Understanding periodic and non-periodic chemistry in periodic tables. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8, 549296.
Chittum, J.R., & Jones, A.T. (2017). The impact of interdisciplinary teaching on science students’ learning: A literature review. Journal of STEM Education Research, 1(2), 14-26.
David, G. A. (2018). Introduction to mechatronics and measurement systems. MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION.
Ding, L., Zhu, X., Chen, G., & Mechtley, A. (2018). Use of 3D printing technology in chemistry education: A systematic review. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 617-629.
Herald, C. (2019). Sphero robots and the periodic table. Science Scope, 43(4), 53-57.
Kalotschke, M., & Blasczyk, M. (2017). The role of educational robotics based on LEGO in chemistry education for fostering interest and motivation among high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 858-864.
Kara, A, & Bayırtepe, E. (2021). The effectiveness of robotics in chemistry education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 170, 104279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104279
Lim, C. P., Bahri, S., & Goh, W. W. (2020). Learning Physics through Robotics: A Pedagogical Approach. Robotics, 9(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9010018
Lim, K. Y., Bahri, N. A., & Goh, W. Y. (2020). Integrating Robotics Technology into Chemistry Education: A Multi-Case Study. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1571-1578. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00018
Lin, T. J., & Lai, C. L. (2018). Cultivating computational thinking abilities and STEM career interests through the application of educational robotics activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 51.
Liu, J., Golonka, E., & Curin, A. (2019). Enhancing chemistry learning through robotics. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 247-253.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British journal of educational psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
Mhlongo, T., & Sedumedi, T. D. (2023). Problems with Periodic Table Theory-Praxis in Chemistry Topics Teaching. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 192-205.
Miller, E.R., & Gerace, W.J. (2011). Instructional methods and student responses predict peer acceptance of a collaborative hands-on science task. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 240-252.
Morales-Menendez, R., Garcia-Méndez, A., & Zizumbo-Villarreal, L. (2016). Design of a robotic system for teaching the periodic table to visually impaired students. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 82(1), 139-155.
Morales-Menendez, R., Garcia-Méndez, P., & Zizumbo-Villarreal, D. (2016). Traditional knowledge and seed selection criteria in landraces of chía (Salvia hispanica L.) in México. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 63(3), 491-506.
Mudau, A. V., & Nkopodi, N. (2015). Teachers' anecdotes on the teaching of periodic tables in the senior phase. Journal of educational studies, 14(1), 125-140.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27-45.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York, NY: Orion Press.
Sánchez, H., Martínez, L. S., & González, J. D. (2019, November). Educational robotics as a teaching tool in higher education institutions: A bibliographical analysis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1391, No. 1, p. 012128). IOP Publishing.
Scerri, E. (2019). The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford University Press.
Soh, J. Y., Lim, K. Y., & Tan, S. C. (2019). A Design-Based Research on Integrating Robotics into Chemistry Education in Singapore Secondary Schools. In A. Lazinica & C. Calafate (Eds.), Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (pp. 21-32). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20214-4_3.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Traver, V. J., Leiva, L. A., Martí-Centelles, V., & Rubio-Magnieto, J. (2021). Educational videogame to learn the periodic table: Design rationale and lessons learned. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(7), 2298-2306.
Turchi, C., Aleotti, J., & Caselli, S. (2020). Educational robotics and tangible programming tools: A review. Robotics, 9(2), 41.
Valko, N. V., & Osadchyi, V. V. (2021, June). Teaching robotics to future teachers as part of education activities. In Journal of physics: Conference series (Vol. 1946, No. 1, p. 012016). IOP Publishing.
Verner, I. M., & Revzin, L. B. (2017). Robotics in school chemistry laboratories. In Robotics in Education: Research and Practices for Robotics in STEM Education (pp. 127-136). Springer International Publishing.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weng, J., & Lu, L. (2018). Promoting scientific literacy in robotics-based science and technology education. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 421-437.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.
