The Impact of Plagiarism on Doctoral Education in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28301/ijsetm.v2i2.20Keywords:
Impact of Plagiarism, Education Ethics, Indonesian Doctoral Education.Abstract
Plagiarism is a serious problem in doctoral education in Indonesia that has widespread detrimental impacts. This paper presents an analysis of the impact of plagiarism on doctoral education in Indonesia. This research includes literature studies and related data that describe the prevalence of plagiarism, causes, and consequences of plagiarism in the context of doctoral education. Plagiarism hinders the doctoral education process by damaging academic integrity, reducing trust in research and researchers, and harming the reputation of educational institutions. This negative impact can affect the academic career progress of doctoral students and hinder innovation and knowledge development. This article also highlights the importance of preventive measures and effective law enforcement to overcome the problem of plagiarism in doctoral education in Indonesia. Collaborative efforts between educational institutions, government and society need to be increased to ensure academic integrity is maintained and doctoral education makes a valuable contribution to the development of science and technology in Indonesia
References
Balachandran Nair, L., & Ascani, A. (2022). Addressing low-profile misconduct in management academia through theoretical triangulation and transformative ethics education. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100728
Chang, S.-H., Shu, Y., Lin, Y.-H., & Wang, C.-L. (2019). “I Believe”, “I Think”, then “I Will”? Investigating the Mediator Role of Ethical Judgment between internet ethical self-efficacy and ethical behavioral intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 387–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.034
Garg, M., & Goel, A. (2022). A systematic literature review on online security assessment: Current challenges and integrity strategies. Computers & Security, 113, 102544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102544
Giannakouli, V., Vraimaki, E., Koulouris, A., Kokkinos, D., Kouis, D., Kyprianos, K., & Triantafyllou, I. (2023). How academic librarians combat student plagiarism. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102785
Jackson, D., Power, T., & Usher, K. (2021). Understanding doctoral supervision in nursing: 'It's a complex fusion of skills.' Nurse Education Today, 99, 104810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104810
Jesos., AM de., Armando, K., & Arsenio, P. (2015). Classroom Community: A Mixed Method Study in a Doctoral Educational Program. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2783–2794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.968
Lee, K.-S., & Benjamin, S. (2023). The death of tourism scholarships… unless…. Annals of Tourism Research, 98, 103520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103520
Lee, Y. (2011). Understanding anti-plagiarism software adoption: An extended protection motivation theory perspective. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 361–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.009
Li, F. (Sam), & Qi, H. (2019). An investigation of push and pull motivations of Chinese tourism doctoral students studying overseas. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 24, 90–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.01.002
Maketo, L., Issa, T., Issa, T., & Nau, S. Z. (2023). M-Learning adoption in higher education towards SDG4. Future Generation Computer Systems, 147, 304–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.05.010
Malik, AR, Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, IW, Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Miller, S., Moos, W., Munk, B., Munk, S., Hart, C., & Spellmeyer, D. (2023). Chapter 9 - Doctoral and professional programs. In S. Miller, W. Moos, B. Munk, S. Munk, C. Hart, & DBT-M. the DDP (Second E. Spellmeyer (Eds.), Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomedicine (pp. 169–196). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-824304-6.00013-4
Nolan, M.T., Liu, H., Li, Z., Lu, C., & Hill, M.N. (2011). International Doctoral Education Partnership: The First Full-Time Doctoral Program for Nurses in China. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27(6), 354–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.04.010
Osipian, A.L. (2012). Economics of corruption in doctoral education: The dissertation market. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.08.011
Stabingis, L., Šarlauskienė, L., & Čepaitienė, N. (2014). Measures for Plagiarism Prevention in Students' Written Work: Case Study of ASU Experience. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 689–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.913
Starfield, S., Paltridge, B., McMurtrie, R., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., Kiley, M., & Lovat, T. (2015). Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners' reports on doctoral theses. Linguistics and Education, 31, 130–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.06.004
Sun, Y.-C., & Yang, F.-Y. (2015). Uncovering published authors' text-borrowing practices: Paraphrasing strategies, sources, and self-plagiarism. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 224–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.003
Tran, M. N., Marshall, S., & Hogg, L. (2023). Chapter 8 - Development of doctoral student perceptions of plagiarism and academic integrity: the roles of agency and aspirational identity. In UG Singh, CS Nair, & RBT-AQ and I. in the NHEDE Watson (Eds.), Chandos Information Professional Series (pp. 143–162). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95423-5.00006-5
Vassallo, J. (2018). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Plagiarism and the ethics of dealing with colleagues. Early Human Development, 124, 65–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.04.028
Zhang, Y. (Olivia), & Hyland, K. (2021). Elements of doctoral apprenticeship: Community feedback and the acquisition of writing expertise. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100835
